Home / Committee of Adjustment Process
The Committee of Adjustment is the municipal body that decides minor variances and consents. Here is what it does, how an application moves through it, and what to expect at the hearing.
Last updated August 2026. By Matthew Kruger, MCIP, RPP.
The Committee of Adjustment is an independent quasi-judicial tribunal appointed by City Council under the Planning Act. It is not a City department, and the members are not planning staff. They are appointed citizens who hear applications, consider the evidence in front of them, and decide.
That distinction matters more than it sounds. Planning staff write a report and make a recommendation. The Committee is not bound by it. Files are won where staff recommended refusal and lost where staff recommended support, and understanding that the Committee is deciding rather than rubber-stamping is the difference between preparing an application and simply filing one.
In Toronto the Committee sits as four separate panels, one for each district: North York, Etobicoke York, Toronto and East York, and Scarborough. Each has its own hearing schedule and its own culture. The panel that hears your file is determined by where the property is, and it affects both how long you wait and what you should expect in the room.
The Committee decides three things: minor variances under Section 45(1), consents to sever land under Section 53, and permission to extend or enlarge legal non-conforming uses. Anything larger, a rezoning or an official plan amendment, goes to Council instead.
You need a minor variance when your proposal complies with zoning in principle but misses a specific standard. A setback that is short by half a metre. A height that exceeds the permitted maximum. Lot coverage or floor space index over the limit. The use is permitted; the dimensions are not.
Before assuming you need a hearing, check whether you still do. Toronto reshaped its residential zoning between 2023 and 2026, and a great many projects that required the Committee five years ago now proceed straight to a building permit. Additional residential units are the clearest example: the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 required municipalities to permit up to three units on most urban residential lots, and Ontario Regulation 462/24 harmonised the standards province-wide in November 2024. Toronto implemented that through By-laws 847-2025 and 849-2025.
So the first question is not how to prepare an application. It is whether an application is required at all. A zoning review answers that, and it is cheaper than finding out at the hearing.
The reverse situation is the expensive one. If work has already been built and does not comply, you are seeking the variance after the fact, and Toronto charges double the application fee for it.
The process runs in a fixed order and each stage has its own failure mode.
Zoning review. Confirm exactly which standards the proposal misses. Every variance has to be listed, and a missed one discovered later means amending the application or returning to a second hearing.
Assemble the application. In Toronto, minor variance and consent applications are accepted only as PDFs by email. You need the completed form, an authorisation signed by every registered owner, a survey, drawings, site photographs, and the tree material: a Tree Declaration Form and a site plan showing protected trees and their protection zones where applicable.
Filing and circulation. The application is circulated internally to City divisions and agencies for comment. This is where technical objections surface, and where an incomplete submission stalls.
Notice. The City mails and posts notice to surrounding owners. For a minor variance that happens at least 10 days before the hearing, and for a consent at least 14 days. This is the moment neighbours find out, and it is usually too late to start the conversation.
Hearing. Your application is presented, anyone can speak for or against, and the Committee usually decides the same day. Decisions can also be deferred, which is common where the panel wants a change or more information.
Appeal period. The decision is not final until the appeal period expires. Anyone with standing can appeal, including a neighbour who lost.
Toronto publishes its Committee of Adjustment fees in a schedule and adjusts them annually, normally effective 1 January, so any figure quoted online is a snapshot of the year it was written. The structure has three tiers: additions and alterations to an existing dwelling with three units or less, a residential dwelling with three units or less, and everything else. Where the variance is sought after the fact, the applicable fee is doubled. Check the City's current fee page before you budget.
That is the municipal fee only, and on a typical file it is a minority of the real cost. Add the survey, the drawings, an arborist report where trees are involved, and the planning work.
One part of the fee schedule almost nobody publishes: you can get some of it back. Toronto may refund 80 percent of the application fee if you withdraw before the application is circulated internally, and 50 percent if you withdraw after circulation but before the Notice of Hearing has been mailed. Once notice has gone out, there is no refund. The cheapest moment to discover an application will not succeed is before it is filed.
Most pages answering this question say two to three months, with nothing behind the number. The City of Toronto publishes every Committee of Adjustment application since 2000 as open data, refreshed daily, so the question can be answered properly.
Measured against recent filings, the median time from filing to hearing runs roughly 50 to 70 days depending on district, with North York at the faster end and Scarborough at the slower one. That is broadly consistent with the two to three months everyone quotes.
The number nobody publishes is the tail. The 90th percentile runs two to three times the median. So one application in ten takes not two months but five, and if you are budgeting a construction season or a closing date, the tail is the number that matters rather than the average.
A methodological note, because it affects how these figures should be read. Measuring from filing to hearing necessarily excludes applications that have been filed but not yet heard, and those are disproportionately the slow ones. Any figure calculated that way is biased slightly optimistic, including the ones above. The honest version measures by hearing date instead, or restricts the analysis to cohorts old enough to be fully resolved.
Two things reliably add to the timeline: a deferral, which puts you on a later agenda, and an appeal, which moves the file to a tribunal and runs on tribunal time rather than yours.
Section 45(1) of the Planning Act sets four tests, and an application has to satisfy all of them. The variance must be minor. It must be desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land. It must maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. And it must maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan.
Applicants tend to argue the first test hardest, because minor sounds like it means small. It does not. Minor is a question of impact, not arithmetic. A variance of a few centimetres that casts a new shadow over a neighbour's rear yard can fail, and a much larger numerical departure that changes nothing anyone experiences can pass.
The third and fourth tests are where thin applications come apart. Intent and purpose means asking what the by-law standard was trying to protect, and demonstrating that the proposal still delivers it. A rear setback exists to preserve separation and privacy. If your proposal reduces the setback but preserves both, you have an argument. If you simply assert that the reduction is small, you do not.
The second test, desirability, is the one where the room matters. It is genuinely evaluative, and it is where neighbour evidence carries weight.
This is what a planning rationale is for. It is not a formality attached to the application. It is the document that answers the four tests in the Committee's own language, and on a contested file it is usually the difference.
The pattern is consistent, and almost all of it is avoidable.
Variances missed at the outset. The application lists four and a fifth surfaces during circulation. Now the application has to be amended or reheard.
Trees discovered late. Tree protection sits outside the zoning by-law entirely, and a protected tree near the build site can force a redesign after the drawings are paid for. The arborist should come before the architect, not after.
Neighbours who first hear about it from a City notice. Ten days before a hearing is the worst possible moment for someone to learn what is happening next door. A conversation weeks earlier turns opponents into people with questions.
An application that argues the wrong thing. Photographs of similar houses on the street are not an answer to the four tests. Other properties having variances does not establish that yours meets them.
Building first. Doubled fee, more staff scrutiny, and the loss of any argument that the proposal is still adjustable.
Refusals are uncommon. The great majority of applications succeed eventually, and the Toronto refusal rate in recent years has run in the low single digits to around six percent depending on the year. If yours is refused, there are three routes and only one has a deadline.
Appeal. In Toronto, Committee of Adjustment decisions go to the Toronto Local Appeal Body. Elsewhere in Ontario they go to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The notice of decision states the last date for appeal, and the period is short. Once it expires the decision is final.
Revise and reapply. Frequently the faster and cheaper route, particularly where the refusal turned on something you can now answer. It is also the most under-used, because a refusal feels like something to fight rather than something to address.
Reconsider the instrument. Sometimes a refusal is telling you the proposal needed a rezoning rather than a variance.
Which of the three fits depends entirely on what the refusal was actually based on, and that is in the decision and the staff report rather than in how it felt on the day.
See the full pricing schedule or the Minor Variance page.
Related guides: Do I need a planner? · How long a minor variance takes · The four tests explained · Application refused, what now · Planning glossary
FAQ
Tell us your address and what you are planning. We will confirm whether the Committee of Adjustment is the right route and handle the application end to end.
Get a Quote No initial fees or commitment