Home / Do I Need a Planner?

Do I need a planner for a Committee of Adjustment hearing?

Short answer: you are not legally required to, and for the very simplest requests you may not need one. But the Committee decides on planning grounds, so for most applications a Registered Professional Planner meaningfully improves the odds. Here is how to judge.

The honest answer

You can represent yourself at a Committee of Adjustment hearing. Nothing in the Planning Act requires a planner. For a genuinely trivial request on a supportive street with no objections, an owner can sometimes carry it alone.

But the Committee does not decide on fairness or effort. It decides on whether the application meets the four planning tests under Section 45 of the Planning Act. Those are planning judgments, and the case for them is far stronger when it is made by someone who makes that case professionally.

When you probably do not need one

If the variance is small and uncontested, the drawings are already prepared, the use is clearly permitted, and staff have signalled support, a careful owner can sometimes handle the hearing. The simpler and less contested the request, the more self-representation can work.

Even then, a short planning review before you file can catch a fatal problem early, which is far cheaper than a refusal.

When a planner clearly pays for itself

Bring in a planner when any of these are true: you are asking for several variances at once, the relief is large enough that the city may question whether it is still minor, neighbours are organizing in opposition, staff have raised concerns, or a refusal would be expensive because it stalls a build or a closing.

In those situations the planner does the thing that wins: frames the application against the four tests, anticipates the objections, and presents evidence the Committee can rely on. A refusal you then have to appeal costs far more than getting it right the first time.

What a planner actually does for you

A planner confirms exactly what relief you need, prepares the justification against the four tests, assembles the application to the standard the Committee expects, and attends the hearing to present it and answer questions. With a fixed fee, that work is a known cost rather than an open meter.

The value is not the paperwork. It is the judgment about whether your request will be seen as minor, and the ability to make that case persuasively in the room.

Minor variance planning fee: from $5,000

includes preparing the application and attending the hearing · excl. HST and municipal fees

Get a Quote No initial fees or commitment

See the full pricing schedule or the Minor Variance page.

FAQ

Common questions

No. You can represent yourself. But the Committee decides on the four planning tests under Section 45 of the Planning Act, and a Registered Professional Planner's evidence carries real weight, so for anything beyond the simplest request professional support improves the odds of approval.

It is better to involve a planner from the start. Much of what determines the outcome, confirming the relief, preparing the justification, and assembling the application correctly, happens before the hearing. A planner brought in only at the end has less to work with.

At Permit.Land a minor variance is a fixed planning fee starting at $5,000, confirmed before work begins, which includes preparing the application and attending the hearing. The municipal application fee and any drawings are separate and disclosed up front.

A refusal can be appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal, but that is a separate and more involved process. It is usually cheaper to get the application right the first time than to self-represent, be refused, and then need professional help on appeal.

Ready?

Tell us your address and what you are planning. We will tell you honestly whether you need a planner for your hearing, and give you a fixed fee if you do. No commitment, no hourly clock.

Get a Quote No initial fees or commitment